Blog #2

This passage was particularly fascinating as it was relatable in a multitude of ways. Specifically, within the field of science many talk purely about successes and failures are seldom mentioned; this approach is considered a necessary evil as it dehumanizes those working in the field, but it also highlights their triumphs. However, as important it is to talk about success, it’s just as valuable to discuss failures–this is the only way to recognize true growth. This is the reason why I was drawn to Franklin’s autobiography as it introduces a new side to one of the greatest minds of the American Revolution. His story is one that emphasizes his humble beginnings, which is just as valuable as his multifaceted roles later in life including an inventor, scientist, diplomat, etc. I believe that this reading was selected in a course dedicated towards understanding scientific virtue because Franklin’s early life is humanized in his book. Most notably, the failures and detours he experienced as an apprentice and journalist further humanize him and his efforts during his lifetime. While reading these passages, I was exposed to a side of Franklin that was otherwise unknown to me. Although I knew his stories of being a successful journalist prior to his role in the Revolution, I was unaware of the actions he carried out behind the scenes to ensure his reputation. Specifically, one passage illustrates how he dressed for his role and was always seen with a book, rather than carrying out actions like shooting. This passage is particularly fascinating because I believe this is the first time we as the readers are able to witness his “scientific virtue” emerge. In order to be successful and earn his credibility, he decided to live in this role by adjusting his lifestyles accordingly. However, in modern times many have exploited this approach as seen in notorious pharmaceutical companies where researchers are forced to submit to the conditions of their job, no matter how unethical they are.

Furthermore, I found it fascinating that the three things Franklin valued included: truth, sincerity, and integrity. I believe that these three traits have been and are currently valued in the scientific realm, but this reading begs the question: what would Franklin think of these same values? Would he say that the field of science continues to uphold these ideals or has that changed? Based on my personal experience as a science major, I would say that these values have changed into ideals; no matter how much scientists place an emphasis on these characteristics, it is now impossible to maintain them due to funding and being at the mercy of society/industry.